|
|
|
NOTICES:
FAQ is a work in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
USGODAE Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
|
Questions
on Data
- QUESTION: [ Data
Disclaimers | Data Naming
| Data Formats | Data
Navigation ]
- Answer: Data Expectations
Questions
on Argo GDAC
- QUESTION: If
I want to compare salinity values collected from other measurement
devices to the Argo float devices, by date, should I look at JULD (or
JULD_LOCATION?) values that were recorded 10-14 days ahead of the
other measurement device (since they drift for 10-14 days)?
For example, suppose I have salinity values recorded from a device on
1/14/09 near Virginia and I want to compare those values to Argo
floats that were also located near Virginia on that day. Should I look
at Argo floats whose JULD values are 1/4/09? or 1/14/09?
- Answer: JULD
is the time that the profile observation was taken. After the 10
days drift phase, the float takes the profile measurement during
ascent phase. Once at the surface, it reports the time it reached
the
surface and the profile measurement. So, you want to match the
Argo
time as closely as you can with the time of the other measurements.
- QUESTION: How
are Argo float data validated? Are all the data in the Argo netCDF
files already validated? Also, I was under the impression that this
site would have the same Argo float data as the coriolis site
(http(cl)//www.coriolis.eu.org/cdc/dataselection/cdcDataSelection.asp).
However, I noticed that the coriolis site has Argo floats displayed on
their map for 4/13/09 to 4/20/09 at these coordinates(cl) 41.02 N,26.27
N, 85.12 W, 56.32 W, but this site does not. Why is that?
- Answer: The
Argo data undergo a series of real-time tests before the data are
distributed. These are a series of quick tests designed to
identify
and flag values that are "obviously bad"; such things as bad
observation date or location, physically impossible values,
unrealistic gradients, etc. The profiles with DATA_MODE = "R" or
"A"
and file names R<float_id>_<cycle>.nc have undergone only
these tests.
Additional scientific quality control tests are applied in
delayed-mode - 6 months to 1 year after observation. In addition
to
more thorough visual screening by an oceanographer, an objective
analysis technique is applied to identify and correct salinity sensor
drift. The profiles with DATA_MODE = "D" and file names
D<float_id>_<cycle>.nc have undergone these additional
tests.
All of these QC procedures are documented in
http://www.coriolis.eu.org//cdc/argo/argo-quality-control-manual.pdf
The two GDACs will generally have the same datasets. The US GDAC
is
currently experiencing an problem with data delivery from the
individual data providers and is receiving all of its data through
synchronization with the French GDAC. This introduces a 24 hour
delay
in the receipt of data at the US GDAC. We hope to have this fixed
very soon. Based on your message, I will double check to be sure
this
is functioning normally.
|
|
|